Comparisons
Compare ProRank SEO
Side-by-side benchmarks of ProRank against the WordPress performance, SEO, and image-optimisation tools you might be using today. All performance numbers come from real PageSpeed runs across three themes (Astra, Hello Elementor, GeneratePress) on the same server.
Performance
Page caching, critical CSS, script delay, and Core Web Vitals tuning.
ProRank vs WP Rocket
ProRank scores 95 mobile vs WP Rocket 73 across 3 WordPress themes. Real PageSpeed data plus full SEO comparison.
See comparisonProRank vs FlyingPress
ProRank scores 95 mobile vs FlyingPress 93. Real PageSpeed benchmark across Astra, Hello Elementor, and GeneratePress.
See comparisonProRank vs LiteSpeed Cache
ProRank scores 95 mobile vs LiteSpeed Cache 80. Real PageSpeed benchmark on Nginx with 27 active plugins.
See comparisonProRank vs W3 Total Cache
ProRank scores 95 mobile vs W3 Total Cache 72. Real PageSpeed benchmark across Astra, Hello Elementor, and GeneratePress.
See comparisonProRank vs Autoptimize
ProRank scores 95 mobile vs Autoptimize 79. Real PageSpeed data across 3 WordPress themes.
See comparisonProRank vs WP-Optimize
ProRank scores 95 mobile vs WP-Optimize 77. Real PageSpeed benchmark across Astra, Hello Elementor, and GeneratePress.
See comparisonProRank vs Perfmatters
ProRank scores 95 mobile vs Perfmatters 88. Real PageSpeed benchmark across Astra, Hello Elementor, and GeneratePress.
See comparisonSEO suites
Titles, meta, schema, sitemaps, redirects — and what each tool ships beyond that.
Image optimisation
Real compression numbers for JPEG, WebP, and AVIF, plus how each tool handles CDN delivery.
ProRank vs ShortPixel
ProRank JPEG 79.4% vs ShortPixel 78.9%, WebP 84.3% vs 82.9%. Plus the full SEO suite.
See comparisonProRank vs Imagify
ProRank WebP 84.3% vs Imagify 67.1%. No credit limits, full SEO included.
See comparisonProRank vs EWWW Image Optimizer
ProRank 79.4% JPEG vs EWWW 62.4%. Dramatically better compression plus SEO.
See comparisonProRank vs Optimole
ProRank AVIF 91.7% vs Optimole 76.6%. Real benchmarks, no CDN lock-in.
See comparison